If you’ve read my UPDATEs over the years, you know that I have worked diligently and professionally with the major public safety employee union while serving as an Orange County Treasurer and Supervisor. Suing them over the unconstitutionality of the granting of retroactive pension benefits was not an easy exercise to pursue. I would publicly joke that taking on a union where every member carries a firearm was not my idea of a good time. And, they were the only union to spend (waste) serious money against me in my election efforts in 2006 (including raising union dues) and 2015.
I also know that they are so powerful, that insecure candidates always want their endorsement and independent expenditure spending support. That’s what makes them so successful in negotiating their salary and benefit increases. That’s why they refer to many elected officials that they deal with as “bobble heads.” They come in and ask for benefit increases and their winning campaign financed elected officials just nod in agreement. Now you can appreciate this massive conflict of interest and why so many of California’s counties and cities are in fiscal distress.
But, public safety employee unions also protect their own, even the bad apples. They certainly did not appreciate my establishing the Office of Independent Review (OIR), which monitored their conduct, reduced lawsuits generated by abuses in the jails, and helped to improve the culture. It was no surprise to me that the OIR was dismantled shortly after I termed out.
Public safety officials are humans, just like everyone else. They enjoy fear and greed just like the best of us. And, they have no compunction to demand as much as they can get and shame those who would even insinuate that they are overpaid. They also protect their own after some of their members have been caught making inappropriate and sometimes deadly decisions.
When you are powerful, a certain air of superiority and arrogance often sets in. This hubris has gotten rather disturbing with the general public, especially when people are being killed. Some form of push back will start, and this year it is from members in the California Legislature.
So, in a state that is virtually controlled by public employee unions, with a capital city that has a very liberal newspaper, and a legislature that was just recently a super majority of Democrats in both houses, it is extremely rare to see a lead editorial in The Sacramento Bee taking on any public employee union or bargaining unit, let alone those representing public safety officials.
But, with AB 931 (which passed out of Committee this morning) and SB 1421, The Sacramento Bee has done just that in the piece below. And, this Republican agrees with the frustrations (see MOORLACH UPDATE — SB 1421 and SB 828 — May 31, 2018). It is time to change the police culture in California.
Bad cops have it too easy in California. Here’s how the Legislature can change that
BY THE SACRAMENTO BEE EDITORIAL BOARD
California’s powerful police unions are used to having their way at the Capitol. For decades, they’ve been able to coerce lawmakers into burying almost every bill that would have forced their members to accept even a modicum of additional transparency or public accountability.
But times may be changing.
On Tuesday, the Senate Public Safety Committee will consider a bill from Democratic Assemblymembers Shirley Weber and Kevin McCarty that, among other things, would impose strict new limits on when cops can use deadly force against suspects.
Not long ago, Assembly Bill 931 would have been dismissed before it was drafted. But that was before March, when two Sacramento police officers chased an unarmed black man named Stephon Clark into his grandparents’ backyard and shot him to death.
Swarmed by national media, the protests since have filled the air right outside the Capitol windows. There has been no escaping the connection between Clark and the long and growing list of Americans — disproportionately black and male — who get killed by police every year for crimes large and small, or sometimes for what turns out to be no crime at all.
In California as elsewhere, this issue has gone unaddressed for far too long. A bold stand now for more sensible police use-of-force standards would not only save lives and improve public trust in law enforcement, but would show the public that state lawmakers can assert themselves.
AB 931, pushed by Weber, D-San Diego, and McCarty, D-Sacramento, would require officers to use deadly force only when it’s “necessary” to stop an imminent threat and only when attempts to de-escalate the situation with nonlethal tactics haven’t worked. Right now, an officer can shoot a suspect when he or she considers it “reasonable” to prevent serious injury or death.
Law enforcement lobbyists insist that such a change would be drastic, but similar policies already are being tried by law enforcement agencies across the country. In Seattle, the results have been positive, with fewer officers in danger and fewer civilians killed. Training is essential, of course, and AB 931 would set aside money for that.
Officers who violate the stricter use-of-force standard could be criminally prosecuted if the law is approved — something that, under current state and federal law, rarely happens. Such prosecutions should be rare, but the tool should be available when needed.
The statutory status quo has been increasingly hard to defend for law enforcement, including the California Peace Officers’ Association and California State Sheriffs’ Association, and the public and many lawmakers are losing patience.
For example, earlier this year, lawmakers lashed out at lobbyists for opposing Senate Bill 1421 by Sen. Nancy Skinner, D-Berkeley, which would force law enforcement agencies to disclose the details of use-of-force investigations and confirmed cases of crimes committed on duty. It short, it would bring the California Peace Officers’ Bill of Rights down to a more reasonable size.
“I think you are completely and utterly out of touch with the realities of how those you are representing are perceived by major segments of California,” said Sen. Holly Mitchell, D-Los Angeles. “And you are not going to be able to lobby your way out of it.”
Even Costa Mesa Republican Sen. John Moorlach said: “This code of silence has gone on a little too long.” He wondered aloud if the former cop who prosecutors believe is the Golden State Killer would have been caught if not for the overly broad Bill of Rights, which is too often used as a shield by bad cops.
SB 1421 cleared the Senate and is scheduled to be heard in Assembly committee later this month. It, along with AB 931, should pass. Police unions have had their way in California for long enough.
This e-mail has been sent by California State Senator John M. W. Moorlach, 37th District. If you no longer wish to subscribe, just let me know by responding with a request to do so.