With the passage of SB 1 in both the Senate and the Assembly, the majority of my constituents are not amused (see MOORLACH UPDATE — Looking Forward — April 15, 2017 april 15, 2017 john moorlach and https://twitter.com/SenatorMoorlach/status/854114394501926912).
The Commentary section of Sunday’s OC Register had the Letter to the Editor provided below. It prompts me to provide you with my veto request letter to Governor Brown that was delivered this morning.
Although I do not expect the Governor to veto this bill, I still wanted to get my two cents in. This afternoon’s Session, and related "instant" Committee hearings, were focused on approving the terms of surrender from those who provided the necessary votes to obtain the two-thirds necessary to increase your taxes. What a crazy way to return from the one week of Spring recess (which meant still working, but not flying to Sacramento).
Not so rosy for us
Re: “New gas tax, vehicle fees expected to more than double funds for road repairs in Orange County” [News, April 14]: This article painted a rosy outlook for SB1 but none of the downsides. What about all the goods transported by truck? Prices will surely rise, along with the cost of diesel fuel. What about the incompetency of Caltrans that our courageous Sen. John Moorlach has exposed? This will allow even more of the taxpayer’s money to fund waste. This is yet more taxes and fees for Californians to bear, and how much will go to that train to nowhere?
Doesn’t it give one pause to think that this bill was passed only by Democrats and one Republican, Sen. Anthony Cannella, who’s termed out and was bribed with half a billion dollars in pork projects for his vote?
— Betty Robinson, Tustin
April 17, 2017
The Honorable Edmund G. Brown, Jr.
Governor, State of California
State Capitol, First Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814
Subject: Senate Bill 1 (Beall): Transportation Funding- REQUEST FOR VETO
Dear Governor Brown:
On behalf of the constituents in Senate District 37, I am writing to request your veto on Senate Bill 1 authored by Senator Jim Beall. I believe our constituents and the people of California deserve better than what this massive tax bill offers. I ask that you consider my objections to the bill below.
1. With the approval by the voters last year of Proposition 55 with its personal income tax increase continuance and Proposition 56, the tobacco tax of $2 per pack, I am concerned, and believe you should be as well, that the State has hit the Gann limit.
2. Last year you signed Senate Bill 32, which furthers the mandate to reduce the consumption of gasoline. In light of this mandate, a tax on gasoline is not a long term solution. We owe it to our constituents to develop solutions which fix the problem for years to come.
3. With our young people driving long distances to their places of employment due to the high cost of housing, we should be modifying the California Environmental Quality Act – which severely restricts developers’ ability to produce in-fill housing – to build more housing closer to job centers. After all, it is the State’s bad and severely antiquated laws that are now ruining our byways.
4. With the percentage of those in California at or below the poverty rate at the highest levels in the nation, we should not be taxing the poor to fix our highways. I constantly hear about college students that are actually starving and families having to decide between food and gas. Senate Bill 1 will just make this reality bleaker.
5. We should not be investing in public transit when ridership is down. Are the poor, who are supposed to benefit from this public service, driving or carpooling instead? Additionally, something that is not often discussed is the significant wear and tear to arterial highways caused by the constant use of heavy buses.
6. We should be looking at more creative solutions to our infrastructure problems, such as an electricity tax for those who charge their zero-emission vehicles at home.
7. The bill provides for $70 million in “efficiency improvements” at Caltrans. If Caltrans reduces the 3,300 architects and engineers that have been deemed excessive, we can save $500 million. Then, if Sacramento outsourced 50% of our architects and engineers like most of the other states do, California can save another $200 million. I proposed a bill to do just that last year, SB 1X 9. Right there, we can achieve $700 million in annual savings. Why are we only aiming for ten percent of that amount?
Governor Brown, in the week that this tax has passed the legislature, I have heard great outcry from our constituents. They are concerned, as they should be, about their financial ability to stay in California. I urge you to veto Senate Bill 1 and instead investigate some of the more creative solutions which don’t include taxing the hard working people of our State.
Very truly yours,
JOHN M. W. MOORLACH
Senator, Thirty-Seventh District
This e-mail has been sent by California State Senator John M. W. Moorlach, 37th District.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, just let me know by responding with a request to do so.